Skip to main content
Home/DPDP Act/Chapter V — Data Protection Board of India/Section 25 — Members and Officers to be Public Servants
DPDP Act, 2023 · Chapter V · Section 25 of 44

Section 25: Members and Officers to be Public Servants

Section 25 is a single, dense sentence with real legal consequences: everyone connected to the Board — Chairperson, Members, officers and employees — is treated as a public servant under the Indian Penal Code whenever acting under the Act, exposing them to specific criminal-law protections and liabilities.

In force since 13 November 2025Reviewed September 2026
StatusIn force
Chapter V · Data Protection Board of India

Quick summary

In plain terms: The Chairperson, Members, officers and employees of the Board are deemed, when acting or purporting to act in pursuance of the Act's provisions, to be public servants within the meaning of Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code.

What Section 25 says

  • Section 25 — the Chairperson, Members, officers and employees of the Board shall be deemed, when acting or purporting to act in pursuance of the provisions of the Act, to be public servants within the meaning of Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code.

Breaking it down

This section imports a specific, well-established legal status — “public servant” under Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code — onto everyone connected to the Board, but only while they're acting (or purporting to act) under the DPDP Act's own provisions.

Public-servant status is a package deal with both protections and obligations. Under Indian criminal law generally, public-servant status brings specific offences that apply to (and protections that apply for) public servants — for example, heightened penalties for offences committed against a public servant in the discharge of their duty, and specific offences a public servant themselves can commit (such as those relating to corruption or abuse of office) that wouldn't apply to a private individual in the same role.

The status is scoped to acting under the Act — not a blanket personal status. “When acting or purporting to act in pursuance of the provisions of this Act” ties the public-servant designation specifically to Board-related conduct, not to every action a Board Chairperson, Member, officer or employee takes in their personal capacity.

“Purporting to act” extends the coverage beyond only correctly authorised action. This phrase means the deeming applies even where someone was acting under a mistaken belief they had authority to do so under the Act, not only where their action was fully and correctly authorised — broadening the practical scope of both the protections and the associated criminal-law obligations.

Why this section matters

Granting a regulatory body real investigatory and adjudicatory powers — summoning witnesses, inspecting documents, imposing penalties — without the accountability structure that comes with public-servant status would be an unusual and potentially risky design. Section 25 slots Board personnel into India's existing, well-understood framework for public-official accountability, rather than creating a novel, untested regime from scratch.

Real-world example

Example

What public-servant status means in a concrete scenario

Consider a Board officer conducting an inquiry under Section 28 into a company's data-breach response.

  • If someone obstructs or assaults that officer while they're conducting the inquiry — the heightened criminal-law consequences that apply to offences against a public servant discharging their duty become relevant, because Section 25 confers that status on the officer for this Act-related conduct.
  • If that same officer were to accept a bribe in connection with the inquiry — the specific criminal offences applicable to public servants (rather than merely private individuals) would apply to their conduct, precisely because Section 25 deems them a public servant while acting under the Act.

Who needs to care about this section

  • Board Chairperson, Members, officers and employees — this section defines their legal status, with both protective and accountability implications, whenever acting under the Act.
  • Anyone interacting with the Board — in an inquiry, investigation or proceeding — relevant context for understanding the legal standing of the Board personnel involved.

Common questions

Does this mean Board Members are literally government employees?
Not necessarily in an employment sense — this section specifically deems them public servants for the purposes of the Indian Penal Code's Section 21 definition, when acting under the DPDP Act, which carries its own specific legal consequences distinct from an employment classification.
Does public-servant status apply to everything a Board employee does, even outside work?
No — the deeming is scoped to conduct “acting or purporting to act in pursuance of the provisions of this Act,” not to their personal life or unrelated conduct.
What is Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code?
It's the IPC's own definition of who qualifies as a “public servant” for purposes of Indian criminal law generally — the DPDP Act extends that existing, well-established definition to Board personnel rather than creating a new definition.