Skip to main content
Home/DPDP Rules/Rule 15 — Transfer of Personal Data Outside the Territory of India
DPDP Rules, 2025 · Rule 15 of 23

Rule 15: Transfer of Personal Data Outside the Territory of India

Rule 15 is short, but it's the rule every organisation using overseas cloud infrastructure or global vendors needs to watch — because the Central Government can add conditions to it at any time.

Effective from 13 May 2027Reviewed September 2026
CommencementEffective from 13 May 2027
DPDP Rules, 2025 · Rule 15 of 23

Quick summary

In plain terms: Cross-border transfer of personal data is permitted by default, subject to any requirements the Central Government may specify by general or special order — for example restricting transfer of specified personal data to particular foreign States, persons or entities.

What Rule 15 says

  • Personal data processed by a Data Fiduciary under the Act may be transferred outside India, subject to the Data Fiduciary meeting requirements the Central Government specifies, by general or special order, in respect of making that data available to a foreign State, or a person or entity under the control of such a State.

Breaking it down

This single sub-rule confirms and operationalises the Act's overall approach to cross-border data flows:

“Restricted list”, not “approved list”. The Act's model is permissive by default: transfers are allowed unless the government specifically restricts them, rather than requiring pre-approval for every destination country the way some other jurisdictions' data-protection laws work. Rule 15 doesn't change that model — it confirms the Central Government's power to add conditions on top of it.

The restriction targets foreign States and state-controlled entities specifically. The rule's language is about making data available to a foreign State, or a person/entity under that State's control — a framing aimed more at geopolitical/national-security-type risk than at ordinary commercial cloud-vendor relationships, though the precise scope of any future order would need to be read carefully when issued.

This is a rule to monitor, not a fixed compliance checklist. Because the actual restrictions come from future general or special orders rather than being listed in the Rule itself, an organisation's cross-border data map needs to be revisited whenever the government issues a new order under this Rule — it isn't a “set once and forget” compliance item.

Why this rule matters

Almost every modern software business relies on overseas infrastructure somewhere in its stack — cloud hosting, analytics, customer-support tooling. Rule 15 is the hook by which the government can, at any point, restrict specific destinations for specific categories of data, so tracking it is part of ongoing vendor and infrastructure risk management, not a one-time legal review.

Real-world example

Example: A SaaS company auditing its vendor data flowsA SaaS company maintains a data-flow map showing which of its vendors (cloud hosting, email delivery, analytics, customer support tooling) store or process Indian users' personal data outside India, and where each is headquartered. When Rule 15 is discussed internally, the compliance team's action isn't a one-time checklist item — it's a standing process: monitor for any general or special order the Central Government issues restricting transfers to specific countries or entities, and be ready to re-route or restrict data flows to any newly named destination.

Who needs to care about this rule

  • Data infrastructure and vendor-management teams maintaining a cross-border data-flow inventory.
  • Legal and compliance teams monitoring for new government orders under this Rule.

Common questions

Is cross-border data transfer banned under the DPDP Rules?
No — transfer outside India is permitted by default. Rule 15 allows the Central Government to impose specific requirements or restrictions by order, rather than prohibiting transfer outright.
Has the Central Government issued a restricted-country list yet?
Any such list would come through a future general or special government order under this Rule; organisations should monitor official notifications for updates rather than assume a fixed list exists.
Does this rule apply to all vendors, or only certain kinds?
The rule's language focuses on data made available to a foreign State or an entity under its control; the exact scope of any specific restriction would depend on the terms of the government order issued under it.